Getting denied for SSDI the first time is frustrating — but it's also common. Most initial applications are rejected. What many people don't realize is that a denial isn't the end of the road. The reconsideration step is the first level of the SSDI appeals process, and understanding how it works can make the difference between giving up and eventually getting approved.
When the Disability Determination Services (DDS) — the state agency that reviews SSDI claims on behalf of the Social Security Administration — denies your initial application, you have the right to appeal. The first step in that appeal process is called reconsideration.
At this stage, a different DDS examiner reviews your entire claim from scratch. They look at everything that was in your original file plus any new medical evidence you submit. The key distinction: it's not the same person who denied you the first time. In theory, fresh eyes evaluate the case.
You have 60 days from the date you receive your denial notice to request reconsideration. SSA assumes you received the notice five days after it was mailed, so in practice you typically have 65 days total. Missing this window can reset the clock on your case — and potentially your back pay eligibility — so the deadline matters.
The reconsideration examiner reviews:
This is not a hearing. There's no judge, no courtroom, no in-person appearance for most claimants. It's a paper review. That's one reason why submitting updated, detailed medical documentation before the decision is made matters so much.
You can file a reconsideration request:
When you request reconsideration, you'll also have the opportunity to explain why you disagree with the initial decision and to flag any medical evidence that wasn't included the first time. If your condition has worsened or you've had new diagnoses, hospitalizations, or treatments since your initial application, that information should be part of your reconsideration file.
Reconsideration is widely known to have a lower approval rate than the next stage of appeal — the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing. Historically, reconsideration has approved a relatively small share of cases that were initially denied, while ALJ hearings have approved a substantially higher share.
This doesn't mean reconsideration is a waste of time. It's a required step in the process for most claimants before they can reach an ALJ hearing. Skipping it or missing the deadline generally means starting over.
| Stage | Who Reviews | Format | Typical Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Application | DDS examiner | Paper review | 3–6 months |
| Reconsideration | Different DDS examiner | Paper review | 3–5 months |
| ALJ Hearing | Administrative Law Judge | In-person or video hearing | 12–24 months |
| Appeals Council | SSA Appeals Council | Paper review | Varies widely |
Each stage has its own deadline. If you're denied at reconsideration, you again have 60 days (plus five for mailing) to request an ALJ hearing.
No two reconsideration cases are identical. Several factors influence how a claim is evaluated:
Reconsideration can address medical eligibility — whether your condition is severe enough to prevent substantial work. It can incorporate new evidence and correct errors in how your RFC was assessed.
What it generally cannot fix: technical denials related to work credits or Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) — the income threshold that determines whether SSA considers you to be working. If you were denied because you don't have enough work credits to qualify for SSDI, reconsideration won't change that outcome. That's a structural issue with the claim itself.
SSI (Supplemental Security Income) operates under different financial rules and doesn't require work credits, which is why some claimants pursue both programs simultaneously — though eligibility for each depends on entirely different criteria.
Understanding the reconsideration process is one thing. Knowing how it applies to your specific denial — what the examiner flagged, whether new evidence could shift the outcome, and how your particular medical history maps onto SSA's evaluation criteria — is something else entirely. The mechanics described here are the same for every claimant. The outcome isn't.
