When the Social Security Administration denies your initial SSDI application, that denial isn't the end of the road. Reconsideration is the mandatory first step in the appeals process — and understanding what actually happens during this stage can make a real difference in how you approach it.
Reconsideration is a complete review of your SSDI claim by someone who had no involvement in the original decision. A different examiner at the Disability Determination Services (DDS) office — the state agency that handles medical reviews for SSA — looks at everything in your file, plus any new evidence you submit.
This is not a hearing. There's no judge, no courtroom. It's a paper review, though in some states a limited form of in-person interview may be available for certain case types.
You have 60 days from the date you receive your denial notice to request reconsideration (SSA assumes you receive the notice 5 days after the mailing date, giving you effectively 65 days). Missing this window typically means starting your application over from scratch.
The reconsideration examiner looks at the same core questions that drove the initial denial:
The examiner also considers your onset date — when SSA determines your disability began — which affects both eligibility and potential back pay.
One of the most important things to understand: reconsideration is not just a rubber stamp of the original decision. You can and should submit new medical evidence that wasn't in your file before. This might include:
The strength of your medical evidence is the single biggest factor in how reconsideration decisions vary from person to person.
It's widely documented that reconsideration has a relatively low approval rate compared to later appeal stages. Many disability advocates describe it as a procedural step that most claimants pass through on their way to an ALJ (Administrative Law Judge) hearing, which is the next level of appeal and where approval rates historically improve.
That said, some claims are approved at reconsideration — particularly those where:
| Factor | How It Shapes Reconsideration |
|---|---|
| Medical condition | Conditions with objective evidence (imaging, lab results) are easier to document than those based on self-reported symptoms |
| Treating physician involvement | A detailed RFC statement from your doctor carries more weight than records alone |
| Work history | If the denial involved a work credits issue, that may resolve differently than a medical denial |
| Age | SSA's vocational grid rules mean claimants over 50 — and especially over 55 — may face different standards for what "other work" they can be expected to do |
| State of residence | DDS offices are state-run, and practices can vary slightly across states |
| Prior application history | Whether this is a first application or a reopened prior claim can affect how the file is evaluated |
Reconsideration typically takes three to six months, though this varies by DDS office workload and case complexity. During this time, SSA may contact your doctors directly for records. You won't receive regular status updates automatically, but you can check your case status through your my Social Security online account.
If your reconsideration is denied, SSA will send you a written notice explaining the reasons. That notice starts another 60-day clock — this time to request a hearing before an ALJ.
Reconsideration sits at the second rung of a four-level appeals process:
Each level has its own procedures, timelines, and decision-makers. Back pay — the lump-sum payment covering the period from your established onset date through approval — continues to accumulate at every stage, which is why pursuing appeals even through denial can ultimately result in significant payments if approved later.
How reconsideration plays out in any individual case comes down to the specifics: what's in the medical file, what the initial denial actually said, whether new evidence changes the picture, and how a claimant's work history and age interact with SSA's vocational rules. The process is the same for everyone — but the variables that drive the outcome belong entirely to the person filing.
