Morgan & Morgan is one of the largest personal injury law firms in the United States, known primarily for car accident, medical malpractice, and workers' compensation cases. But the question of whether they handle Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) cases comes up often — and the answer matters, because who represents you during the SSDI process can significantly affect your outcome.
Morgan & Morgan does market disability representation services, including SSDI and SSI claims. Their disability practice operates somewhat separately from their personal injury work — they have attorneys and non-attorney representatives who focus specifically on Social Security claims. Like many large firms that have expanded into disability law, they handle cases at multiple stages of the process: initial applications, appeals, and ALJ (Administrative Law Judge) hearings.
That said, Morgan & Morgan is not a disability-specialist boutique firm. Their disability division is one part of a broad operation. Whether that structure benefits or limits a particular claimant depends on the complexity of the case, the stage of appeal, and what kind of representation the claimant needs.
Before evaluating any firm, it helps to understand how SSDI representation is regulated.
Attorneys and non-attorney representatives are both permitted to represent claimants before the SSA. Non-attorney representatives must meet SSA accreditation requirements but are not licensed lawyers.
Fees are federally capped. Under SSA rules, disability representatives typically work on contingency — meaning they charge nothing upfront. If you win, the SSA caps representative fees at 25% of back pay, up to a maximum dollar amount that adjusts periodically (currently $7,200 as of recent SSA updates, though this figure is subject to annual review). The SSA must approve the fee arrangement directly.
This fee structure is the same whether you work with Morgan & Morgan, a solo disability attorney, or a national advocacy group. No firm can legally charge more than what SSA allows.
Understanding where a representative adds value requires knowing how the SSDI appeals process works:
| Stage | What Happens | Average Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Application | SSA and state DDS review medical and work records | 3–6 months |
| Reconsideration | Second DDS review after denial | 3–5 months |
| ALJ Hearing | In-person or video hearing before a judge | 12–24 months wait |
| Appeals Council | Review of ALJ decision | 12–18 months |
| Federal Court | Lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court | Varies widely |
Statistically, most SSDI claims are denied at the initial and reconsideration stages. Approval rates rise significantly at the ALJ hearing level, which is where experienced representation tends to make the largest difference. A representative who knows how to build a medical record, frame a claimant's Residual Functional Capacity (RFC), and argue effectively before an ALJ is doing different work than someone who simply files paperwork.
Whether you're considering Morgan & Morgan or any other firm, these are the questions that matter for your specific situation:
Who will actually handle your case? Large firms often assign cases to staff members or non-attorney representatives. Ask whether an attorney will appear at your ALJ hearing or whether that role falls to someone else.
What stage are you at? Some firms focus on ALJ hearings and may not take cases at the initial application stage. Others handle the full process. Where you are in the appeals pipeline affects who will take your case and how they'll approach it.
What is your medical condition and documentation? SSDI eligibility turns on whether your condition prevents substantial gainful activity (SGA) — defined by an earnings threshold the SSA adjusts annually. Your RFC, medical records, treatment history, and physician documentation all feed into that determination. A representative's ability to gather and present that evidence matters more than firm size.
What is your work credit situation? SSDI requires a sufficient work history — generally 40 credits, with 20 earned in the last 10 years, though younger workers have lower thresholds. If work credits are insufficient, the relevant program may be SSI (Supplemental Security Income), not SSDI. These are separate programs with different rules, and not every firm handles both equally well.
Large national firms like Morgan & Morgan offer accessibility — recognizable names, multiple office locations, and streamlined intake processes. For claimants who want a familiar brand or live in areas with limited options, that accessibility has real value.
Smaller disability-focused firms or solo practitioners sometimes offer more direct attorney involvement, deeper familiarity with specific ALJ panels, and more personalized case management. Some claimants find that a representative who handles only SSDI cases brings a narrower but sharper focus to the work.
Neither approach automatically produces better outcomes. Approval depends on the strength of your medical evidence, your work history, your specific disabling condition, and how well your case is presented — not on which firm handles it.
The SSA's decision ultimately rests on whether your medical record demonstrates an inability to engage in substantial gainful activity, how your age and education factor into vocational assessments, and whether your onset date aligns with your work credit eligibility window. A representative can build and argue your case — but they cannot manufacture evidence that doesn't exist or override SSA's medical and vocational criteria.
Morgan & Morgan can represent SSDI claimants. So can hundreds of other firms and accredited representatives across the country. What no one outside your own case can tell you is whether the representation you choose will be the right fit for where your claim stands, what your records show, and how your particular appeal needs to be argued.
